THE
CHIEMGAU CRATER STREWN FIELD: EVIDENCE OF A HOLOCENE LARGE IMPACT EVENT IN
SOUTHEAST BAVARIA, GERMANY
Faculty
of Geosciences, University of Würzburg, Germany. E-mail: kernstson@ernstson.de
Institute
for Interdisciplinary Studies, Gilching, Germany. E-mail: mr@infis.org
The
Chiemgau strewn field in the Alpine Foreland was discovered in the early new
millennium and comprises more than 80 craters in a roughly elliptically shaped
area with axes of about 60 km and 30
km. The crater diameters range between a few meters and a few hundred meters.
Unless leveled by, e.g., farming activities, the craters exhibit more or less
pronounced rim walls, and the diameter-to-depth ratio has been determined to be
7.5 on average. Geologically, the craters occur in Pleistocene moraine and
fluvio-glacial sediments (gravel plains). The craters and surrounding areas so
far investigated in more detail are featuring heavy deformations of the
Quaternary cobbles and boulders, abundant fused rock material (impact melt rocks
and various glasses), shock-metamorphic effects, and geophysical anomalies [1,
2, 3]. The hitherto established largest crater of the strewn field is Lake Tüttensee
exhibiting an 8 m-height rim wall, a rim-to-rim diameter of about 500 m and a
depth of roughly 30 m. Some 50 excavation pits around Lake Tüttensee have
revealed a layer that reflects all aspects of a catastrophic event. The up to 1
m thick layer basically is a polymictic breccia of heavily shattered cobbles and
boulders of Alpine lithologies mixed with largely undeformed however abundantly
scratched and polished cobbles. The layer is rich in organic material like
charcoal and splinters of wood. Animal bones and teeth, tufts of (possibly
human) hair, and archeological Stone and Bronze Age artifacts like pottery
shards and stone implements are intermixed. Abundant deeply corroded
skeletal-like carbonate and silicate clasts contribute to the breccia. The corrosion is suggested to have originated from the action of high
temperatures (decarbonization, melting) or/and the action of strong acid
dissolution (nitric acid precipitation from the impact explosion cloud). Shock
metamorphism in breccia clasts is indicated by PDFs in quartz and feldspar,
diaplectic glass in feldspar, strong kinkbanding in mica, and intense
microtwinning in calcite. The stratigraphic context of the breccia deposit,
radiocarbon dating and the dating by Stone and Bronze Age artifacts exclude any
relation with Alpine glaciations. Since any Holocene geological endogenetic
processes can be eliminated, too, a meteorite impact to have formed Lake
Tüttensee,
the surrounding breccia layer as its ejecta blanket, and the whole crater field
is most reasonable. Additional thermoluminescence [4] and radiocarbon dating [5]
in the field of the other craters, and further dating by archeological finds
confine the impact event to have happened in the first millennium B.C., most
probably between 600 and 400 B.C [6]. The impact is substantiated by the
abundant occurrence of metallic, glass and carbon spherules, a kind of
accretionary lapilli and of strange matter in the form of iron silicides like
gupeiite and xifengite, and various carbides. A gupeiite analysis from the
Chiemgau strewn field closely resembles meteoritic suessite. Nanodiamonds and
fullerene-like material have been reported to occur in the melt crust of cobbles
from the strewn field [2]. The find context for the exotic matter is in most
cases hardly compatible with an industrial production, and an origin from the
impact process or/and as constituents of the impactor must be considered. The
impactor is suggested to have been a low-density disintegrated, loosely bound
asteroid or a disintegrated comet in order to account for the extensive strewn
field.
References.
- [1] Hoffmann, V. et al. (2004) Geophysical Research Abstracts, 6, 05041 [2]
Hoffmann, V. et al. (2005) Abstract Int. Met. Soc. Conf., Gatlinburg [3]
Ernstson,
K. (2006) www.chiemgau-impact.com/gravimetrie/html
[4] B. Raeymaekers, pers. com.
[5] Fehr, K.T. (2005) Meteoritics Planet. Sci.,
40, 187-194 [6] Rappenglück, B. & Rappenglück, M.A. (2006) Mediterranean
Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 6, No. 3, 101-109.